On
the Joint Work of the Commissions
of the Moscow Patriarchate and the Russian Orthodox Church Outside
of Russia
Based upon our common Orthodox belief in our Lord and Savior Jesus
Christ and upon our faithfulness to the common canonical Tradition
of the Russian Orthodox Church, and acting in accordance with the
instructions formulated over the course of the discussions held
under the chairmanship of His Holiness Patriarch Alexy of Moscow
and All Russia in Moscow on May 17-18, 2004, during the visit of
the delegation of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia
led by His Eminence Metropolitan Laurus of Eastern America and New
York, the Commission of the Moscow Patriarchate on discussions with
the Russian Church Abroad and the Commission of the Russian Orthodox
Church Outside of Russia on discussions with the Moscow Patriarchate,
during joint meetings held in Moscow (June 22-24 and November 17-19,
2004), in Munich (September 14-16, 2004) and in Paris (March 2-4,
2005), prepared a series of draft documents subsequently approved
by the Hierarchies of the Moscow Patriarchate and the Russian Orthodox
Church Outside of Russia.
The statements "On the Relationship Between the Church and
State" and "On the Attitude of the Orthodox Church Towards
the Heterodox and Towards Inter-Confessional Organizations"
reflect the common understanding of these questions of principle
by both the Russian Orthodox Church and the Russian Orthodox Church
Outside of Russia.
The drafted "Act on Canonical Communion" determines the
canonical status of the historically-formed assemblage of the dioceses,
parishes, monasteries, brotherhoods and institutions of the Russian
Orthodox Church Outside of Russia as an inalienable, self-governing
part of the Russian Orthodox Church, based on grounds similar to
those foreseen by the Statutes ["Ustav"] of the Russian
Orthodox Church as they apply to Self-Governing Churches on the
territory of the Moscow Patriarchate. Upon the enactment of this
proposed Act, the fullness of canonical communion within a single
Pomestny [Local] Russian Orthodox Church, headed by His
Holiness Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia, shall be restored.
According to the draft, the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia
is independent in pastoral, educational, administrative, management,
property and civil matters. The supreme authority within the Russian
Church Abroad is manifested in her Sobor [Council] of Bishops,
convened by her President (the First Hierarch) on the basis of the
"Regulations of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia."
In accordance with the canonical order of the Orthodox Church, decisions
falling outside the competency of the Council of Bishops of the
Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia are made in concord with
the Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia and the Holy Synod of the
Russian Orthodox Church. The highest instance of ecclesiastical
authority are the Pomestny [Local] and Bishops' Councils
of the Russian Orthodox Church, whose decisions, as well as the
decisions of the Holy Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church, have
force in the Russian Church Abroad, taking into account the particularities
determined by the "Act on Canonical Communion," the "Regulations
of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia" and the laws
of the nations in which it conducts its service. The bishops of
the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia are members of the
Pomestny and Bishops' Councils of the Russian Orthodox
Church and participate in the established order at meetings of the
Holy Synod. The Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia receives
its holy myrrh from the Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia.
In accordance with the Act on Canonical Communion, certain additions
and amendments must be entered into Chapter VII of the Statutes
of the Russian Orthodox Church ("Self-Governing Churches"),
and also into the Regulations of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside
of Russia.
The Commissions of the Russian Orthodox Church and the Russian Orthodox
Church Outside of Russia also examined the question of how to view
the many official declarations, decisions, epistles and other such
documents issued by the First Hierarchs of the Moscow Patriarchate
and the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia, and also by the
organs of ecclesiastical authority in the fatherland and abroad
over the course of the decades during which canonical communion
between the Moscow Patriarchate and the Russian Orthodox Church
Outside of Russia was absent. Some of these documents contained
canonical suspensions or other expressions of canonical rejection
of the hierarchies and of the presence of grace in church life on
the other side of the division. In connection with this, it is proposed
that when the above Act is put into effect, all previous acts which
would hinder the fullness of canonical communion are declared invalid.
In addition, on the question of the relationship between the Church
and state it becomes clear that the "Basic Social Concept"
of the Russian Orthodox Church, confirmed by the Council of Bishops
of the Russian Orthodox Church in 2000, is also accepted by the
Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia as a document which faithfully
reflects the teachings of the Church regarding her relationship
with the state and society. Documents of individual hierarchs and
organs of ecclesiastical authority issued in the period of the Church
under conditions of totalitarian rule antagonistic to the Church
both in the Fatherland and abroad which do not express the true
voice of the Church of Christ are deemed no longer valid or not
in effect. Having been dictated by extreme circumstances, they cannot
be viewed as possessing the ecclesiastical norm. Among the documents
recognized as such are, for instance, "Epistle to the Clergy
and Flock" (the so-called "Declaration") of 1927
and the Paschal Epistle of the First Hierarch of the Russian Orthodox
Church Outside of Russia of 1942.
Further clarifications with regard to the "Epistle to the Clergy
and Flock" were given by the Commissions of the Moscow Patriarchate
and the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia in their "Commentary"
on the Joint Document "On the Relationship between the Church
and State."
The Commissions took into account that the Hierarchy of the Russian
Orthodox Church Outside of Russia of November 17, 2004, addressed
the so-called "Synod in Resistance" in Greece with a proposal
for them to normalize relations with their Local Churches. To date,
a positive response to this letter has not been received. However,
in a letter from the "Synod in Resistance" dated October
24, 2004, it is stated that actual canonical communion with the
Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia had already ceased and
cannot be restored while the path of peacemaking with the Moscow
Patriarchate continues. The final settlement of this question is
expected before the enactment of the Act on Canonical Communion.
During the joint sessions, a preliminary examination was made of
the matter of the status of clergymen who moved from one jurisdiction
to another while under canonical suspension. With the aim of further
resolving this problem and presenting proposals to the Hierarchies,
a special Sub-commission was formed whose work is continuing.
The Commissions recognized that the reestablishment of full unity
of the organizational structures of the Russian Orthodox Church
outside of her canonical territory is a desirable goal which should
be pursued. Still, the historical realities developed through the
long separation must be taken into account. For this reason, in
the aim of further establishing the life of a single Russian Church,
it is necessary to apply proper oikonomia and pastoral discretion,
gradually developing pastoral cooperation in the countries of the
Russian diaspora with the special oversight of the Holy Synod of
the Russian Orthodox Church and the Synod of Bishops of the Russian
Orthodox Church Outside of Russia.
The Commissions propose that the same spirit of oikonomia and pastoral
discretion be used to develop a canonically-just decision of the
matter of the dioceses and parishes of the Russian Orthodox Church
Outside of Russia situated on the canonical territory of the Moscow
Patriarchate. Such a decision is viewed as one of the conditions
of reestablishing Eucharistic communion and the canonical unity
within a single Local Russian Orthodox Church.
|